Arts Blog !!!

devianART


I would like to address an important problem kopiarstwa, which is now so developed in the network. Recently created an increasing number of blogs, forums in which the writers can not create computer graphics for its time. Then will "borrow" something from the gallery artists. An example is the international gallery deviantART. Many bloggers stealing from thence to insert pictures into your blogs, often asking for permission from work.
Once this problem was not so cumbersome, but now where I do not watch, the blogs are hundreds of drawings (mostly) deviantART. Bloggers think that the creator does not work if you will notice a few pracek. Later, however, it becomes the insertion of several works that have appealed to Blogger, and just be themselves appropriated. "I downloaded the picture from the gallery ... author probably will not notice, even if you are sure to close his eyes. For in the end what it publishes?" -This line of thinking to today's bloggers.

As one of many artists from deviantART, I am against kopiarstwu. Community of artists trying to remedy this problem, using a variety of ways. Blog: Amber neck was acting against this scourge, and describes the consequences kopiarstwa. In addition, some artists allow you to use the majority of his drawings. (prohibiting only add strings of "Do not copy !!!!!" and other galleries and addresses of zamazywania Artah) write about this in journalu on their galleries. However, it does not help. Thieves do not pay attention to the prohibitions. Destroyed on 1 blog, using the images belong 100% to the author created a few other blogs.
Alfa Romeo Wallpaper

Copyright enjoyed by everyone who has created something original and your own. Without the consent of the author can not use its work. Act of February 4, 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights:

Article 1
1. Subject matter of copyright is a manifestation of creative activity, each with its own character set in any form, regardless of the amount, purpose, and the expression of the (track).
2. In particular, the subject of copyright works are:
1) expressed in words, mathematical symbols, graphic signs (literary, journalistic, scientific, cartographic and computer programs),
2) plastic
3) Photo,
4) Guitars,
5) industrial design,
6) architecture, architectural and urban design and urban planning,
7) Music and musical-musical
8) stage, theatrical-musical, choreographic and pantomime,
9) audiovisual (including visual and audialne).
3. The song is the subject of copyright law since the findings, even though he had not completed the form.
4. Protection vest regardless of the fulfillment of any formality.

Rule 2
1. Development of someone else's work, in particular, translation, processing, adaptation, is subject to copyright law, without prejudice to the rights of the original song.
2. Disposition and use of the development depends on the approval of the original creator of the work (right of subsidiaries), unless the author's economic rights to the original work have expired.
3. Creator of the original song may revoke a permit if, within five years from its grant to develop has not been widespread. Remuneration paid to the creator is not refundable.
4. For the development are not considered work, which was the result of someone else's inspiration piece.
5. Studies on the copies include the author and the title track of the original.

I hope that it will speak even to the "thieves" who, without authorization take someone else's work. You can pay for it, even a fine.